CSA
UnknownUSDOT 2643790· CARRIER· EIN 90-0827993
⬇ PDF report

BASELINE ENERGY SERVICES LP

201 FOCH STREET, FORT WORTH, TX, 76107(833) 769-7436chigh@baseline-enserv.comGRAHAM RADLER
Vetting snapshot
Authority
Unknown
per SAFER
Insurance
No active filing
not required
Vehicle OOS
16.7%
below 22% national avg
Driver OOS
4.8%
below 6.7% national avg
Crashes 24mo
0
clean
Red flags
None
nothing flagged
100
/ 100

Risk factors

Low riskVioCodes score
No red flags in the public FMCSA record

A weighted read of the public FMCSA signals below — authority, insurance, out-of-service, crashes, roadside OOS rates, and carrier connections. A starting point for vetting, not a guarantee.

Roadside inspection performance

Out-of-service rate vs national average. Lower is better.

Vehicle18 inspections · 16.7% OOS · National 22%
Driver21 inspections · 4.8% OOS · National 6.7%

CSA performance breakdown

FMCSA · Sep 2026

21 inspections · 37 violations (10 OOS) · 26% of inspections had an OOS finding.

21
Inspections
37
Violations
10
OOS violations
10
Distinct codes

Violations by BASIC

click to filter codes

16
total

Most inspected in · top 6 states

  • NM7
  • KS5
  • TX5
  • CO5
  • OK4
  • WY1

Latest FMCSA SMS snapshot. Codes link to the lookup — severity weighting, contest angles, and the DataQs Drafter for each. Click a BASIC to filter the codes.

Recommendations

What’s driving each score, what to do about it, and where it could go.

A high share of violations are occurring in La Salle County, TX

Medium impact

12 of 22 violations in the last 12 months (55%) came from inspections in La Salle County, TX. That can mean tougher enforcement there or simply more of your miles run through it — either way it's worth a look.

What to do
  • Review the inspections from La Salle County, TX to spot recurring issues
  • Brief drivers running that lane; consider rerouting around the toughest enforcement corridors where practical

Unsafe Driving needs attention

Low impact

Estimated Unsafe Driving percentile of 0% is under the 65% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What to do
  • Review recent inspections with violations in this BASIC and take remedial action with drivers/equipment

False log / RODS violations are the leading contributor to Hours-of-Service Compliance

Low impact

Estimated Hours-of-Service Compliance percentile of 53% is under the 65% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What’s contributing6 violations (24 mo)
False log / RODS2 viol60%
  • 395.8F01Drivers record of duty status not current1× · 50%
  • 395.22H4Driver failed to maintain supply of blank drivers records of duty status graph-grids1× · 10%
Log / ELD device4 viol40%
  • 395.22H2Driver failing to maintain ELD instruction sheet1× · 15%
  • 395.22H3Driver failed to maintain instruction sheet for ELD malfunction reporting requirements1× · 15%
  • 395.24C2III-ELDSDNHOS (ELD) - Driver failing to manually input or verify shipping document number.1× · 5%
What to do
  • Audit ELD edits and duty-status annotations weekly; a false log is a high-severity, high-visibility violation
  • Retrain on correct logging and never letting a load pressure a driver into a false entry
Projected estimatecould improve up to 25 pts in ~12 mo
nowin 12 months
Current trend 50% followed 100% followed 65% line

Controlled Substances/Alcohol needs attention

Low impact

Estimated Controlled Substances/Alcohol percentile of 0% is under the 80% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What to do
  • Review recent inspections with violations in this BASIC and take remedial action with drivers/equipment

Brakes violations are the leading contributor to Vehicle Maintenance

Low impact

Estimated Vehicle Maintenance percentile of 19% is under the 80% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What’s contributing5 violations · 1 OOS (24 mo)
Brakes1 OOS2 viol44%
  • 396.3A1BOSBRAKES OUT OF SERVICE: The number of defective brakes is equal to or greater than 20 percent of the service brakes on the vehicle or combination1× · 22%
  • 393.47A-BCFSHEHydraulic/Electric Brake - Contaminated friction surface1× · 22%
Wheels / rims1 viol22%
  • 393.205C-WRAWFLMIBWheel/Rim - Any wheel fasteners loose/missing/ineffective/broken.1× · 22%
Inspection / repair / DVIR1 viol22%
  • 396.17C-PIOperating a CMV without documentation of a periodic inspection1× · 22%
Lighting / lamps1 viol11%
  • 393.9A-LILLighting - Identification lamp(s) inoperative1× · 11%
What to do
  • Check brake adjustment and listen for air leaks every pre-trip; put brakes on the PM schedule
  • Fix air-loss and warning-light faults before dispatch — don’t “drive it in”
  • Prioritize the out-of-service items — they carry the heaviest weight
Projected estimatecould improve up to 11 pts in ~12 mo
nowin 12 months
Current trend 50% followed 100% followed 80% line

Recommendations are generated from the carrier’s public FMCSA roadside-inspection record. Percentiles and projections are VioCodes estimates, not official FMCSA figures. Informational, not legal advice.

90-day safety improvement plan

What this carrier has struggled with most in the last 90 days — where to focus now.

Improving
2
Inspections
0
Violations
0
Out-of-service
2
Clean
Focus here first
🎓
Turn these into driver coaching — and prove it
FleetTrained (my companion project) makes branded, multilingual training videos for these exact violations — your driver watches and gets a completion certificate for the file.

Based on roadside inspections in the last 90 days, ranked by what recurs most. Informational, not legal advice.

Inspection & crash map

live · FMCSA MCMIS

Every inspection and crash on record — hover a point for the summary, click for full detail (codes, severity, CSA points).

27
Inspections
37
Violations
10
Out-of-service
44
CSA points
1
Crashes
6
States
cleanviolOOS

CSA points = violation severity weight × FMCSA time weight (3× in the last 6 months, 2× at 6–12, 1× at 12–24). Points are spread within each state — FMCSA records the inspection state, not an exact location. Source: FMCSA MCMIS.

Equipment

VINs via NHTSA

36 distinct vehicles seen in this carrier’s roadside inspections.

23 trailer 12 incomplete vehicle 1 truck
2023 RAM 4500seen 6×
3C7WRLEL9PG620486· 3KV003 OK
2022 FORD F-450seen 5×
1FD0X4HT0NEF22943· K162613 TX
2022 FORD F-450seen 2×
1FD0W4HT3NED61197· K159343 TX
2024 FORD F-450seen 2×
1FD0X4HT9RED68206· 3LD957 OK
2022 CHEVROLET Silverado HDseen 2×
1GB4YSEY4NF294967· 3KM037 OK
2026 FORD F-350seen 2×
1FD8W3HT3TED27383· 3NM765 OK
2026 FORD F-350seen 2×
1FD8W3HT9TED22334· 3NL845 OK
2014 LOAD TRAIL Load Trail
4ZECH162XE1050325· 1398JV OK
2015 RED OAK MFG Red Oak Mfg
52WBC1625FR010748· NONE OK
2015 MAGNUM PRODUCTS Magnum Products
5AJGS213XFB501830· CY2353 OK
2019 GENERAC MOBILE PRODUCTS, LLC GENERAC MOBILE PRODUCTS, LLC
7FSPG2136KB691569· CY4978 OK
2015 MAGNUM PRODUCTS Magnum Products
5AJGS2134FB500043· CU9789 OK
2022 FORD F-350
1FD8X3HT9NED57214· 17C214 OK
2018 BIG TEX Big Tex
16VGX2028J2088622· BP8867 OK
2015 MAGNUM PRODUCTS Magnum Products
5AJGS212XFB502628· CY2383 OK
2015 MAGNUM PRODUCTS Magnum Products
5AJGS2123FB504592· BP8410 OK
2014 MAGNUM PRODUCTS Magnum Products
5AJGS2126EB415131· DQ8342 OK
2015 MAGNUM PRODUCTS Magnum Products
5AJGS213XFB505604· CU9784 OK
2019 GENERAC MOBILE PRODUCTS, LLC GENERAC MOBILE PRODUCTS, LLC
7FSPG2138KB167257· CY5225 OK
2025 FORD F-450
1FD0W4HT6SED01099· 94C363 OK
2024 LOAD TRAIL Load Trail
4ZEGC2033R1312960· CY4986 OK
2018 LOAD TRAIL Load Trail
4ZEGH2526J1165927· BP8490 OK
2022 FORD F-450
1FD0X4HT3NEF28249· 3KL938 OK
2024 LOAD TRAIL Load Trail
4ZECH1622R1311646· CY4999 OK
2018 GENERAC MOBILE PRODUCTS, LLC GENERAC MOBILE PRODUCTS, LLC
7FSPG2130JB974774· CD2605 OK
2024 RAM 3500
3C7WRTCL4RG312700· 82C312 OK
2019 GENERAC MOBILE PRODUCTS, LLC GENERAC MOBILE PRODUCTS, LLC
7FSPG2139KB691565· CD2669 OK
2026 LOAD TRAIL Load Trail
4ZEGC2031T1362280· DN1833 OK
2024 RAM 3500
3C63R3HL6RG358139· VSK1080 TX
2022 GREAT DANE TRAILERS Great Dane Trailers
1GR4M0622NH335127· BX3928 OK

+ 6 more.

Equipment is inferred from VINs recorded on roadside inspections (FMCSA MCMIS), decoded via the NHTSA vPIC API — it reflects vehicles inspected, not a current fleet roster.

Company profile

FMCSA census

PRIVATE PROPERTY

Power units
67
on file (MCS-150)
Drivers
67
6 hold a CDL
Annual mileage
2.6M mi
reported 2024
Recordable crash rate
0.00
per million miles
How far they run · drivers by operating lane
  • Interstate · 100+ mi67 drivers
Company officer
GRAHAM RADLER
Operation
Interstate
D-U-N-S
52152818
Registered since
2015-06-10
Last MCS-150 update
2025-10-28
Census status
Active

Fleet: 67 trucks · 1,255 owned trailers.

Source: FMCSA Company Census File (data.transportation.gov). Fleet and driver counts are self-reported on the carrier’s most recent MCS-150 filing.

Connections

carrier graph

This carrier shares VINs with 1 other carrier — review the connections below as part of your vetting.

1
Connected carriers
1
Fleet-transfer links
1
Most shared VINs
0
Strong links

Shared VINs come from FMCSA roadside-inspection records — a vehicle inspected under more than one carrier, often a fleet transfer or trailer interchange. Other links come from the FMCSA census. Shared identifiers are common and often legitimate — treat these as leads to investigate, not proof of wrongdoing.

Activity history

2 events
  1. 10/28/2025MCS-150 update filed

    2.6M mi reported (2024)

  2. 06/10/2015Registered with FMCSA

    PRIVATE PROPERTY

Merged from FMCSA authority, insurance, out-of-service, and census records.

🚛

Operations

Classification

  • PRIVATE PROPERTY

Area served

  • Interstate

FMCSA safety rating

Rating
Not rated
Type
Rated
Last review
📄

MCS-150 registration

Form date
2025-10-28
Reported mileage
2,607,071 mi (2024)

Got a violation you want to contest?

Use the free AI-powered DataQs Drafter to generate a polished challenge letter — quotes the relevant 49 CFR, predicts your grant chance.

Open the Drafter →
Data sourced from public FMCSA records via safer.fmcsa.dot.gov · Latest FMCSA update: Sep 2026 · Page refreshed: Sep 22, 2026, 1:31 PM. VioCodes is not affiliated with FMCSA. To dispute incorrect data, file a DataQs Request for Data Review.