CSA
UnknownUSDOT 309929· CARRIER· EIN 38-2286816
⬇ PDF report

TOM MACERI & SON INC

23000 W. INDUSTRIAL DRIVE SUITE A, ST CLAIR SHORES, MI, 48080-1180(586) 552-1555ebaloga@tommaceriandson.comMARY ANNE MACERI
Vetting snapshot
Authority
Unknown
per SAFER
Insurance
No active filing
not required
Vehicle OOS
40%
above 22% national avg
Driver OOS
2.7%
below 6.7% national avg
Crashes 24mo
8
none fatal
Red flags
None
nothing flagged
60
/ 100

Risk factors

Moderate riskVioCodes score
Vehicle OOS 40% — well above the 22% national average8 crashes in the last 24 months

A weighted read of the public FMCSA signals below — authority, insurance, out-of-service, crashes, roadside OOS rates, and carrier connections. A starting point for vetting, not a guarantee.

Roadside inspection performance

Out-of-service rate vs national average. Lower is better.

Vehicle10 inspections · 40% OOS · National 22%
Driver37 inspections · 2.7% OOS · National 6.7%

CSA performance breakdown

FMCSA · Sep 2026

37 inspections · 35 violations (5 OOS) · 17% of inspections had an OOS finding.

37
Inspections
35
Violations
5
OOS violations
10
Distinct codes

Violations by BASIC

click to filter codes

14
total

Most inspected in · top 4 states

  • MI24
  • GA3
  • KY2
  • FL1

Latest FMCSA SMS snapshot. Codes link to the lookup — severity weighting, contest angles, and the DataQs Drafter for each. Click a BASIC to filter the codes.

Recommendations

What’s driving each score, what to do about it, and where it could go.

Vehicle out-of-service rate exceeds the national average

High impact

Vehicle OOS rate is 40% vs the 22% national average. Carriers above the national OOS average draw more enforcement attention (audits, roadside stops) and can see higher insurance premiums.

What to do
  • Review recent inspections with out-of-service violations and fix the root causes with equipment and drivers
  • Run a preventative-maintenance program; periodically inspect tires, brakes and lights
  • Reinforce thorough pre-trip and post-trip inspections; retrain where needed

A high share of violations are occurring in Livingston County, MI

Medium impact

5 of 27 violations in the last 12 months (19%) came from inspections in Livingston County, MI. That can mean tougher enforcement there or simply more of your miles run through it — either way it's worth a look.

What to do
  • Review the inspections from Livingston County, MI to spot recurring issues
  • Brief drivers running that lane; consider rerouting around the toughest enforcement corridors where practical

Phone / texting violations are the leading contributor to Unsafe Driving

Low impact

Estimated Unsafe Driving percentile of 56% is under the 65% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What’s contributing12 violations (24 mo)
Phone / texting2 viol37%
  • 392.82DUMTDriver - Using a hand-held mobile telephone2× · 37%
Speeding3 viol30%
  • 392.2-SLLSWZState/Local Laws - Speeding work/construction zone1× · 19%
  • 392.2-SLTFCState/Local Laws - Speeding basic rule/speed too fast for conditions1× · 6%
  • 392.2-SLLS2State/Local Laws - Speeding 6-10 miles per hour over the speed limit1× · 5%
Following / lane / reckless5 viol20%
  • 392.2-SLLLRState/Local Laws - Lane restriction violation3× · 11%
  • 392.2-SLLMLState/Local Laws - Failure to maintain lane1× · 6%
  • 392.2-SLLTCDState/Local Laws - Failed to obey a traffic control device - Permanent or Temporary - e.g., safety official, signal, sign, light, lane marking, other1× · 3%
Seat belt2 viol13%
  • 392.16ADDriver - Failed to use seat belt while operating a CMV.1× · 9%
  • 392.16-DDriver - Failed to use seat belt while operating a CMV1× · 4%
What to do
  • Hands-off-the-phone policy with real consequences; provide a mount and a do-not-disturb setup
Projected estimatecould improve up to 20 pts in ~12 mo
nowin 12 months
Current trend 50% followed 100% followed 65% line

Hours-of-Service Compliance needs attention

Low impact

Estimated Hours-of-Service Compliance percentile of 0% is under the 65% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What to do
  • Review recent inspections with violations in this BASIC and take remedial action with drivers/equipment

Controlled Substances/Alcohol needs attention

Low impact

Estimated Controlled Substances/Alcohol percentile of 0% is under the 80% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What to do
  • Review recent inspections with violations in this BASIC and take remedial action with drivers/equipment

Lighting / lamps violations are the leading contributor to Vehicle Maintenance

Low impact

Estimated Vehicle Maintenance percentile of 62% is under the 80% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What’s contributing11 violations · 4 OOS (24 mo)
Lighting / lamps6 viol56%
  • 393.9A-LHLILighting - Headlamp(s) - Any inoperative3× · 37%
  • 393.11A1-LRLMLighting - Tail lamp - Any missing1× · 14%
  • 393.9A-LILLighting - Identification lamp(s) inoperative1× · 3%
Tires2 OOS2 viol23%
  • 393.75A3-TAOLTires - All others, leaking or inflation less than 50% of the maximum inflation pressure on tire not equipped with ATIS1× · 15%
  • 393.75A3-TAOLTISTires - All others, leaking in tread area and inflation less than 50% of the maximum inflation pressure on tire equipped with ATIS1× · 8%
Brakes2 OOS3 viol21%
  • 393.47A-BSFBrake - Malfunction causing smoke or fire to emit from the wheel end1× · 14%
  • 393.45B2-BHTDAir Brake - Hose/tubing damage into the outer reinforcement ply.1× · 5%
  • 393.45B2-B-AIRAir Brake - Hose/tubing damaged or not secured1× · 3%
What to do
  • Walk the lights every pre-trip and carry spare bulbs/fuses; clean lenses and check the trailer plug
  • Prioritize the out-of-service items — they carry the heaviest weight
Projected estimatecould improve up to 37 pts in ~12 mo
nowin 12 months
Current trend 50% followed 100% followed 80% line

Recommendations are generated from the carrier’s public FMCSA roadside-inspection record. Percentiles and projections are VioCodes estimates, not official FMCSA figures. Informational, not legal advice.

90-day safety improvement plan

What this carrier has struggled with most in the last 90 days — where to focus now.

Holding steady
5
Inspections
5
Violations
1
Out-of-service
1
Clean
Where the violations are
Unsafe Driving 40%Vehicle Maintenance 40%Other 20%
Focus here first
1Unsafe Driving
2 violations · 40% of recent
  • 392.2-SLLSWZState/Local Laws - Speeding work/construction zone
  • 392.82DUMTDriver - Using a hand-held mobile telephone
Do this
  • Coach speed and following distance — Unsafe Driving points are weighted heavily
  • Hands off the phone; always belt up
2Vehicle Maintenance
2 violations · 1 OOS · 40% of recent
  • 393.9A-LHLILighting - Headlamp(s) - Any inoperative
  • 393.47A-BSFBrake - Malfunction causing smoke or fire to emit from the wheel end · OOS
Do this
  • Walk the lights every pre-trip and carry spare bulbs/fuses
  • Clean lenses and check the trailer plug for corrosion
3Other
1 violation · 20% of recent
  • 392.2-SLLDLState/Local Laws - Misc. driver's license violation
Do this
  • Track CDL, medical card, and endorsement expirations ahead of time
  • Keep the DQ file complete and the medical card on the driver
🎓
Turn these into driver coaching — and prove it
FleetTrained (my companion project) makes branded, multilingual training videos for these exact violations — your driver watches and gets a completion certificate for the file.

Based on roadside inspections in the last 90 days, ranked by what recurs most. Informational, not legal advice.

Inspection & crash map

live · FMCSA MCMIS

Every inspection and crash on record — hover a point for the summary, click for full detail (codes, severity, CSA points).

47
Inspections
53
Violations
8
Out-of-service
296
CSA points
27
Crashes
7
States
cleanviolOOS

CSA points = violation severity weight × FMCSA time weight (3× in the last 6 months, 2× at 6–12, 1× at 12–24). Points are spread within each state — FMCSA records the inspection state, not an exact location. Source: FMCSA MCMIS.

Equipment

VINs via NHTSA

37 distinct vehicles seen in this carrier’s roadside inspections.

18 incomplete vehicle 10 trailer 9 truck
2026 FREIGHTLINER Cascadiaseen 6×
3AKJHHDR0TSWS1131· 3802694 IN
2023 KENWORTH T280seen 4×
2NK3HM6X7PM244810· RC23683 MI
2020 KENWORTH T3 Seriesseen 3×
2NKHHM6X2LM391598· BD60016 MI
2020 GREAT DANE TRAILERS Great Dane Trailersseen 3×
1GR1A0627LB180800· E400087 MI
2023 KENWORTH T280seen 3×
2NK3HM6X1PM252174· BD30945 MI
2019 KENWORTH T680seen 2×
1XKYDP9X6KJ343218· RB71873 MI
1989 GREAT DANE TRAILERS Great Dane Trailersseen 2×
1GRAA0623KB128711· E823066 MI
2016 GREAT DANE TRAILERS Great Dane Trailersseen 2×
1GRAA0620GB704942· E400701 MI
2011 FREIGHTLINER M2seen 2×
1FVACXDT1BDBC4916· DF41187 MI
2023 KENWORTH T280seen 2×
2NK3HM6X3PM252175· BD30902 MI
2020 GREAT DANE TRAILERS Great Dane Trailersseen 2×
1GR1A0624LB180799· E638693 IN
2025 FREIGHTLINER Cascadiaseen 2×
3AKJHLDV5SSVX8954· RC41771 MI
2025 FREIGHTLINER M2seen 2×
3ALACWFC1SDWC9034· BE00798 MI
2020 GREAT DANE TRAILERS Great Dane Trailersseen 2×
1GR1A0622LB180798· E921272 MI
2025 KENWORTH T280seen 2×
2NK3HM6X5SM140907· BE06813 MI
2025 FREIGHTLINER M2seen 2×
3ALACWFC9SDVR7454· BE17392 MI
2016 INTERNATIONAL MA025seen 2×
3HAMMMMN6GL452482· BD24010 MI
2015 FREIGHTLINER Cascadia
3AKJGED6XFSGM7802· RC06977 MI
2015 FREIGHTLINER M2
3ALACWDT8FDGM2024· RC18621 MI
2019 KENWORTH T680
1XKYDP9X9KJ295472· RB68037 MI
2012 GREAT DANE TRAILERS Great Dane Trailers
1GRAA062XCB710225· E638695 MI
2012 FREIGHTLINER M2
1FVACWDT9CDBE3483· BD24001 MI
2021 FREIGHTLINER M2
3ALACWFC1MDMK6412· BD65359 MI
2024 KENWORTH T680
1XKYDP9X0RJ327428· 61662Z WI
2012 FREIGHTLINER M2
1FVACWDT7CDBE5622· BD24000 MI
2024 KENWORTH T280
2NK3HM6X1RM360359· BD78240 MI
2025 FREIGHTLINER Cascadia
3AKJHLDV3SSVX8953· RC41770 MI
2019 FREIGHTLINER M2
3ALACWFCXKDKH1576· BE25395 MI
2014 FREIGHTLINER M2
3ALACXDT7EDFK2431· BD45979 MI
2013 FREIGHTLINER Cascadia
3AKJGEDR6DSFG6587· RC11779 MI

+ 7 more.

Equipment is inferred from VINs recorded on roadside inspections (FMCSA MCMIS), decoded via the NHTSA vPIC API — it reflects vehicles inspected, not a current fleet roster.

Crash record (US, last 24 months)

Total

8

Tow-away

8

Injury

4

Fatal

0

Company profile

FMCSA census

PRIVATE PROPERTY

Power units
44
on file (MCS-150)
Drivers
38
38 hold a CDL
Annual mileage
1.7M mi
reported 2025
Recordable crash rate
per million miles
How far they run · drivers by operating lane
  • Interstate · 100+ mi38 drivers
Company officer
MARY ANNE MACERI
Operation
Interstate
D-U-N-S
21839618
Registered since
1988-02-12
Last MCS-150 update
2025-10-13
Census status
Active

Fleet: 44 trucks · 12 owned tractors · 16 owned trailers.

Source: FMCSA Company Census File (data.transportation.gov). Fleet and driver counts are self-reported on the carrier’s most recent MCS-150 filing.

Connections

carrier graph

This carrier shares VINs with 3 other carriers — review the connections below as part of your vetting.

3
Connected carriers
3
Fleet-transfer links
1
Most shared VINs
0
Strong links

Shared VINs come from FMCSA roadside-inspection records — a vehicle inspected under more than one carrier, often a fleet transfer or trailer interchange. Other links come from the FMCSA census. Shared identifiers are common and often legitimate — treat these as leads to investigate, not proof of wrongdoing.

Activity history

2 events
  1. 10/13/2025MCS-150 update filed

    1.7M mi reported (2025)

  2. 02/12/1988Registered with FMCSA

    PRIVATE PROPERTY

Merged from FMCSA authority, insurance, out-of-service, and census records.

🚛

Operations

Classification

  • PRIVATE PROPERTY

Area served

  • Interstate

FMCSA safety rating

Rating
Not rated
Type
Rated
Last review
📄

MCS-150 registration

Form date
2025-10-13
Reported mileage
1,680,841 mi (2025)

Got a violation you want to contest?

Use the free AI-powered DataQs Drafter to generate a polished challenge letter — quotes the relevant 49 CFR, predicts your grant chance.

Open the Drafter →
Data sourced from public FMCSA records via safer.fmcsa.dot.gov · Latest FMCSA update: Sep 2026 · Page refreshed: Sep 22, 2026, 8:31 PM. VioCodes is not affiliated with FMCSA. To dispute incorrect data, file a DataQs Request for Data Review.