CSA
UnknownUSDOT 1304307· CARRIER· EIN 20-1233099
⬇ PDF report

M&W DRILLING

Legal: M&W DRILLING LLC

8321 OAK RIDGE HIGHWAY, KNOXVILLE, TN, 37931(865) 690-0128jmcdonald@mwdrillingllc.comFIRAS MISHU
Vetting snapshot
Authority
Unknown
per SAFER
Insurance
No active filing
not required
Vehicle OOS
33.3%
above 22% national avg
Driver OOS
9.1%
above 6.7% national avg
Crashes 24mo
0
clean
Red flags
None
nothing flagged
60
/ 100

Risk factors

Moderate riskVioCodes score
Vehicle OOS 33.3% — well above the 22% national averageDriver OOS 9.1% — above the 6.7% national average

A weighted read of the public FMCSA signals below — authority, insurance, out-of-service, crashes, roadside OOS rates, and carrier connections. A starting point for vetting, not a guarantee.

Roadside inspection performance

Out-of-service rate vs national average. Lower is better.

Vehicle24 inspections · 33.3% OOS · National 22%
Driver33 inspections · 9.1% OOS · National 6.7%

CSA performance breakdown

FMCSA · Sep 2026

33 inspections · 39 violations (14 OOS) · 30% of inspections had an OOS finding.

33
Inspections
39
Violations
14
OOS violations
10
Distinct codes

Violations by BASIC

click to filter codes

15
total

Most inspected in · top 8 states

  • TN8
  • KY6
  • NC6
  • VA4
  • AR2
  • GA2
  • WV1
  • PA1

Latest FMCSA SMS snapshot. Codes link to the lookup — severity weighting, contest angles, and the DataQs Drafter for each. Click a BASIC to filter the codes.

Recommendations

What’s driving each score, what to do about it, and where it could go.

Vehicle and driver out-of-service rate exceeds the national average

High impact

Vehicle OOS rate is 32% vs the 22% national average. Driver OOS rate is 9.1% vs the 6.7% national average. Carriers above the national OOS average draw more enforcement attention (audits, roadside stops) and can see higher insurance premiums.

What to do
  • Review recent inspections with out-of-service violations and fix the root causes with equipment and drivers
  • Run a preventative-maintenance program; periodically inspect tires, brakes and lights
  • Reinforce thorough pre-trip and post-trip inspections; retrain where needed

Lighting / lamps violations are the leading contributor to Vehicle Maintenance

Medium impact

Estimated Vehicle Maintenance percentile of 78% is close to the 80% intervention line — worth getting ahead of before it crosses.

What’s contributing22 violations · 11 OOS (24 mo)
Lighting / lamps10 viol33%
  • 393.9A-LSLILighting - Stop lamps - Any inoperative.2× · 13%
  • 393.9A-LRLILighting - Tail lamp - Any inoperative2× · 10%
  • 393.9A-LILLighting - Identification lamp(s) inoperative3× · 5%
Tires2 OOS3 viol26%
  • 393.75A3-TAOLTires - All others, leaking or inflation less than 50% of the maximum inflation pressure on tire not equipped with ATIS2× · 21%
  • 393.75C-TAOTD-LT2/32Tires - Less than 2/32 inch tread depth1× · 6%
Load securement5 OOS5 viol22%
  • 393.130B-CHVEHeavy Vehicles/Equipment - Improper securement of accessory equipment or articulated vehicles1× · 9%
  • 393.100B-CCargo - Cargo not secured to prevent leaking/spilling/blowing/falling from CMV2× · 6%
  • 393.110B3-CCargo - Insufficient tiedowns (w/o headerboard/blocking) for article(s) of cargo longer than 10 feet1× · 5%
Brakes1 OOS1 viol6%
  • 393.43DBMABrake - Breakaway not attached to the towing vehicle1× · 6%
What to do
  • Walk the lights every pre-trip and carry spare bulbs/fuses; clean lenses and check the trailer plug
  • Prioritize the out-of-service items — they carry the heaviest weight
Projected estimatecould improve up to 34 pts in ~12 mo
nowin 12 months
Current trend 50% followed 100% followed 80% line

A high share of violations are occurring in Appomattox County, VA

Medium impact

8 of 27 violations in the last 12 months (30%) came from inspections in Appomattox County, VA. That can mean tougher enforcement there or simply more of your miles run through it — either way it's worth a look.

What to do
  • Review the inspections from Appomattox County, VA to spot recurring issues
  • Brief drivers running that lane; consider rerouting around the toughest enforcement corridors where practical

Following / lane / reckless violations are the leading contributor to Unsafe Driving

Low impact

Estimated Unsafe Driving percentile of 47% is under the 65% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What’s contributing6 violations (24 mo)
Following / lane / reckless3 viol46%
  • 392.2-SLLTCDState/Local Laws - Failed to obey a traffic control device - Permanent or Temporary - e.g., safety official, signal, sign, light, lane marking, other3× · 46%
Seat belt1 viol39%
  • 392.16-DDriver - Failed to use seat belt while operating a CMV1× · 39%
Speeding2 viol15%
  • 392.2-SLLS2State/Local Laws - Speeding 6-10 miles per hour over the speed limit2× · 15%
What to do
  • Defensive-driving refresher on following distance and lane discipline
Projected estimatecould improve up to 22 pts in ~12 mo
nowin 12 months
Current trend 50% followed 100% followed 65% line

False log / RODS violations are the leading contributor to Hours-of-Service Compliance

Low impact

Estimated Hours-of-Service Compliance percentile of 36% is under the 65% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What’s contributing1 violations · 1 OOS (24 mo)
False log / RODS1 OOS1 viol100%
  • 395.8K2-HOSRCHOS (Manner) - Driver failed to retain a copy of each record of duty status for the previous 7 consecutive days which shall be in his/her possession and available1× · 100%
What to do
  • Audit ELD edits and duty-status annotations weekly; a false log is a high-severity, high-visibility violation
  • Retrain on correct logging and never letting a load pressure a driver into a false entry
  • Prioritize the out-of-service items — they carry the heaviest weight
Projected estimatecould improve up to 18 pts in ~12 mo
nowin 12 months
Current trend 50% followed 100% followed 65% line

Controlled Substances/Alcohol needs attention

Low impact

Estimated Controlled Substances/Alcohol percentile of 0% is under the 80% line. In decent shape, but here's what's driving it.

What to do
  • Review recent inspections with violations in this BASIC and take remedial action with drivers/equipment

Recommendations are generated from the carrier’s public FMCSA roadside-inspection record. Percentiles and projections are VioCodes estimates, not official FMCSA figures. Informational, not legal advice.

90-day safety improvement plan

What this carrier has struggled with most in the last 90 days — where to focus now.

Improving
3
Inspections
1
Violations
1
Out-of-service
2
Clean
Where the violations are
Vehicle Maintenance 100%
Focus here first
1Vehicle Maintenance
1 violation · 1 OOS · 100% of recent
  • 393.75A3-TAOLTires - All others, leaking or inflation less than 50% of the maximum inflation pressure on tire not equipped with ATIS · OOS
Do this
  • Gauge/thump every tire on the walk-around, including inner duals
  • Replace before tread hits the limit and correct low pressure immediately
🎓
Turn these into driver coaching — and prove it
FleetTrained (my companion project) makes branded, multilingual training videos for these exact violations — your driver watches and gets a completion certificate for the file.

Based on roadside inspections in the last 90 days, ranked by what recurs most. Informational, not legal advice.

Inspection & crash map

live · FMCSA MCMIS

Every inspection and crash on record — hover a point for the summary, click for full detail (codes, severity, CSA points).

40
Inspections
48
Violations
19
Out-of-service
394
CSA points
7
Crashes
11
States
cleanviolOOS

CSA points = violation severity weight × FMCSA time weight (3× in the last 6 months, 2× at 6–12, 1× at 12–24). Points are spread within each state — FMCSA records the inspection state, not an exact location. Source: FMCSA MCMIS.

Equipment

VINs via NHTSA

45 distinct vehicles seen in this carrier’s roadside inspections.

19 trailer 18 incomplete vehicle 6 truck 2 other
2008 KENWORTH T8 Seriesseen 4×
1XKDP4TX08J232864· J086HZ TN
2025 TRAIL KING INDUSTRIES TRAIL KING INDUSTRIESseen 4×
1TKJ04935SM117148· U509306 TN
2024 KAUFMAN TRAILERS GROUP, LLC Kaufman Trailers Group, LLCseen 3×
7UZFD2423RL002725· 505678T TN
2022 FORD F-550seen 3×
1FD0W5HT0NED47327· C321HU TN
2019 FORD F-550seen 3×
1FD0W5HT0KEG79683· G625HT TN
2022 FORD F-550seen 2×
1FD0W5HTXNEE24298· C493HU TN
2020 KAUFMAN TRAILERS OF SC KAUFMAN TRAILERS OF SCseen 2×
1K9FR3627LB367472· 032778T TN
2016 KENWORTH T8 Seriesseen 2×
3WKDD49XXGF119054· T9830HY TN
2024 KAUFMAN TRAILERS GROUP, LLC Kaufman Trailers Group, LLCseen 2×
7UZFR3620R2000618· 543303T TN
2015 KAUFMAN TRAILERS OF NCseen 2×
5VGFD242XFL001400· U992026 TN
2017 KAUFMAN TRAILERS OF NCseen 2×
5VGFD2428HL002550· U720509 TN
2022 FORD F-550seen 2×
1FD0W5HT1NEE24299· C406HU TN
2022 FORD F-550seen 2×
1FD0W5HT8NEE24297· C492HU TN
2023 FORD F-550seen 2×
1FD0W5HT5PEC36260· C746HU TN
2022 FORD F-550seen 2×
1FD0W5HT2NED21053· C340HU TN
2022 BIG TEX Big Texseen 2×
16V3F3829N6135800· 195409T TN
2022 FORD F-550seen 2×
1FD0W5HT9NEC96197· C289HU TN
2025 KAUFMAN TRAILERS GROUP, LLC Kaufman Trailers Group, LLCseen 2×
7UZFR3627S2000282· 621427T TN
2015 KENWORTH T8 Seriesseen 2×
1XKDD40X5FJ455573· V3167HY TN
2022 KAUFMAN TRAILERS OF NCseen 2×
5VGFD2424NL000225· 214188T TN
2006 FORD F-350
1FDWW37PX6EA68598· C161HS TN
2000 HURST TRAILERS
1H9T32122Y1057427· T781996 TN
2012 KENWORTH T8 Series
1XKDDP9X6CJ300191· N2247HY TN
2023 FORD F-550
1FD0W5HT7PEC36258· C747HU TN
2022 FORD F-550
1FD0W5HT4NEE24300· C407HU TN
LAMR
1L0SL12244M325262· T874838 TN
2011 HURST TRAILERS Hurst Trailers
1H9T32121B1057312· T781997 TN
2024 BIG TEX Big Tex
16V3F3826R6316259· 425100T TN
1999 HURST TRAILERS
1H9T32122X1057060· T781992 TN
2020 FORD F-550
1FD0W5HT9LED13125· H200HT TN

+ 15 more.

Equipment is inferred from VINs recorded on roadside inspections (FMCSA MCMIS), decoded via the NHTSA vPIC API — it reflects vehicles inspected, not a current fleet roster.

Company profile

FMCSA census

PRIVATE PROPERTY

Power units
28
on file (MCS-150)
Drivers
34
18 hold a CDL
Annual mileage
0.5M mi
reported 2024
Recordable crash rate
0.00
per million miles
How far they run · drivers by operating lane
  • Interstate · <100 mi34 drivers
Company officer
FIRAS MISHU
Operation
Interstate
D-U-N-S
172181245
Registered since
2004-11-15
Last MCS-150 update
2025-08-27
Census status
Active

Fleet: 28 trucks · 4 owned tractors · 38 owned trailers.

Source: FMCSA Company Census File (data.transportation.gov). Fleet and driver counts are self-reported on the carrier’s most recent MCS-150 filing.

Connections

carrier graph

This carrier shares VINs or phone numbers with 2 other carriers — review the connections below as part of your vetting.

2
Connected carriers
1
Fleet-transfer links
1
Most shared VINs
0
Strong links

Shared VINs come from FMCSA roadside-inspection records — a vehicle inspected under more than one carrier, often a fleet transfer or trailer interchange. Other links come from the FMCSA census. Shared identifiers are common and often legitimate — treat these as leads to investigate, not proof of wrongdoing.

Activity history

2 events
  1. 08/27/2025MCS-150 update filed

    0.5M mi reported (2024)

  2. 11/15/2004Registered with FMCSA

    PRIVATE PROPERTY

Merged from FMCSA authority, insurance, out-of-service, and census records.

🚛

Operations

Classification

  • PRIVATE PROPERTY

Area served

  • Interstate

FMCSA safety rating

Rating
Not rated
Type
Rated
Last review
📄

MCS-150 registration

Form date
2025-08-27
Reported mileage
548,000 mi (2024)
📜

Changes on file

FMCSA census history
  1. September, 2022

    • Fleet grew to 25 power units
    • Drivers grew to 34
  2. February, 2022

    • Drivers grew to 28
  3. January, 2021

    First on-record entry — M&W DRILLING LLC, ,

Got a violation you want to contest?

Use the free AI-powered DataQs Drafter to generate a polished challenge letter — quotes the relevant 49 CFR, predicts your grant chance.

Open the Drafter →
Data sourced from public FMCSA records via safer.fmcsa.dot.gov · Latest FMCSA update: Sep 2026 · Page refreshed: Sep 15, 2026, 2:59 AM. VioCodes is not affiliated with FMCSA. To dispute incorrect data, file a DataQs Request for Data Review.